Systematic Review and its Role in Clinical Decision Making

Mohsen Saberi Isfeedvajani


Systematic reviews as secondary research studies are used as the gold standard to help healthcare professionals and healthcare policy makers in decision making. Clinical decisions need to be based on high quality, up-to-date research evidence. Systematic reviews start with well-defined research questions and explicit and reproducible search strategies in order to critically appraise and integrate results of primary research studies.


Systematic Review, Decision Making, Healthcare

Full Text:



Debray TP, Damen JA, Snell KI, et al. A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance. Bmj. 2017;356:i6460. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6460.

Pollock A, Berge E. How to do a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2017:1747493017743796. doi:10.1177/1747493017743796.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.

Simons M, Busch K, Avolio A, Kiat H, Davidson A. Improving the quality of the evidence - The necessity to lead by example. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;46:165-166. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2017.09.004.

Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350:g7647. doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535.

Kazerani M, Davoudian A, Zayeri F, Soori H. Assessing abstracts of Iranian systematic reviews and metaanalysis indexed in WOS and Scopus using PRISMA. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:18. doi:10.18869/mjiri.31.18.

Nissen T, Wayant C, Wahlstrom A, et al. Methodological quality, completeness of reporting and use of systematic reviews as evidence in clinical practice guidelines for paediatric overweight and obesity. Clin Obes. 2017;7(1):34-45. doi:10.1111/cob.12174.

Cullis PS, Gudlaugsdottir K, Andrews J. A systematic review of the quality of conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric surgery. PLoS One. 2017;12(4):e0175213. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175213.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Medical Reviews is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.